Virginia is one of just five states that account for forty percent of the total amount of toxic discharges to U.S. waterways in 2010, according to a new report released today by Environment America. The study also reports that 226 million pounds of toxic chemicals were discharged into 1,400 waterways across the country.
The other top-polluting states are Indiana, Nebraska, Texas, and Georgia.
â€œAmericaâ€™s waterways are a polluterâ€™s paradise right now. Polluters dumped 226 million pounds of toxic chemicals into our lakes, rivers and streams in 2010,â€ said Shelley Vinyard, Clean Water Advocate with Environment America. â€œWe must turn the tide of toxic pollution by restoring Clean Water Act protections to our waterways.â€
The Environment America report documents and analyzes the dangerous levels of pollutants discharged to Americaâ€™s waters by compiling toxic chemical releases reported to the U.S. EPAâ€™s Toxics Release Inventory for 2010, the most recent data available.
Major findings of the report include:
â€¢ Pollution from just five statesâ€”Indiana, Virginia, Nebraska, Texas, and Georgiaâ€”accounted for nearly forty percent of the total amount of pollution dumped into our waterways in 2010
â€¢ Food and beverage manufacturing (slaughterhouses, rendering plants, etc.), primary metals manufacturing, chemical plants, and petroleum refineries were some of the largest polluters. AK Steel dumped the most toxic pollutionâ€”nearly 30 million poundsâ€”into our waterways in 2010.
â€¢ In 2010, industries discharged approximately 1.5 million pounds of cancer-causing chemicals, like arsenic, chromium, and benzene, into Americaâ€™s waterways. Nevadaâ€™s Burns Creek received the largest volume of carcinogens in 2010, while neighboring Mill Creek placed third.
â€¢ Nitrates accounted for nearly 90 percent of the total volume of discharges to waterways reported in 2010. Nitrates are toxic, particularly to infants consuming formula made with nitrate-laden drinking water, who may be susceptible to methemoglobinemia, or â€œblue babyâ€ syndrome, a disease that reduces the ability of blood to carry oxygen throughout the body.
Environment Americaâ€™s report summarizes discharges of cancer-causing chemicals, chemicals that persist in the environment, and chemicals with the potential to cause reproductive problems ranging from birth defects to reduced fertility. Among the toxic chemicals discharged by facilities are arsenic, mercury, and benzene. Exposure to these chemicals is linked to cancer, developmental disorders, and reproductive disorders.
â€œThe Clean Water Actâ€™s original objective was to clean up all of Americaâ€™s waterways by 1985â€”27 years ago,â€ said Rob Kerth, Analyst for Frontier Group and co-author of the report. â€œMany people born in 1985 have kids of their own now, yet still millions of pounds of toxic chemicals are being dumped into our waterways.â€ In order to curb the toxic pollution threatening waterways like the Chesapeake Bay, the Colorado River and Puget Sound, Environment America recommends the following:
1. Pollution Prevention: Industrial facilities should reduce their toxic discharges to waterways by switching from hazardous chemicals to safer alternatives.
2. Protect all waters: The Obama administration should finalize guidelines and conduct a rulemaking to clarify that the Clean Water Act applies to all of our waterways â€“ including the 2.5 million miles of streams in and 117 million Americansâ€™ drinking water for which jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act has been called into question as a result of two polluter-driven Supreme Court decisions in the last decade.
3. Tough permitting and enforcement: EPA and state agencies should issue permits with tough, numeric limits for each type of toxic pollution discharged, ratchet down those limits over time, and enforce those limits with credible penalties, not just warning letters.
â€œThe bottom line is that Americaâ€™s waterways shouldnâ€™t be a polluterâ€™s paradise, they should just be paradise. We need clean water now, and we are counting on the federal government to act to protect our health and our environment,â€ concluded Vinyard.